obsidian: pin electron to 39; add prince213 as maintainer #510075
Conversation
|
@Prince213 i've opened this pr due to inactivity on #505535. |
|
I'm waiting for maintainer feedback on #505535 before merging, and yes I'd like to become a maintainer. |
|
for my feedback as a maintainer, see #505535 (review). i don't have a strong preference towards which option is better, i'd default to conforming to the obsidian version upstream expects as done here because it is simpler. i can't put much more time into this issue for now due to personal reasons, so i'll leave it up to you/others to decide which pr to merge and which to close. |
Prince213
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this would be better until upstream update their electron version, or when electron_39 reached EOL.
d8c2891 to
9153c15
Compare
|
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
Upstream nixpkgs switched obsidian's electron argument from `electron` to `electron_39` (pinned to match the upstream Obsidian bundle, see NixOS/nixpkgs#510075). The rebuild failed with "unexpected argument 'electron'" until the override matched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
closes #505078
supersedes #505535 and #505407
this removes the
electroninput, replacing it withelectron_39.the method used in #380617 no longer applies since #483820.
this pr will break any electron overrides once it hits master, but this seems to be normal judging by the other prs relating to #483820.
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.